First off i hope people at today's APO meeting (3/9/08) know that i am fine with the outcome of the motion and that i hold no grudges towards anybody who voted against it or anyone who spoke their minds during the discussion of the motion.
I guess what i've decided to do here in this note is just to get across my ideas and viewpoints.
*note a lot of things that i am going to talk about here i've said during the discussion part of the motion"
So the motion i created was "i move to credit Kyle Higashidani, Matt Tan, Brian Chen, and Jacky Luong 3 hours of community service hours for their involvement with creating sectionals favors for sectionals."
The first point i wanted to come across with was that I openly admitted that i had not done my job properly and that that is why in my motion i had not put my name up for receiving service hours and that because i didn't do my job properly that the individuals name above shouldn't be discredited.
The next point I wanted to come across was that I wasn’t here to try to sneak around the SVPs and that I wasn’t trying to take advantage of the system. I was merely using my active powers to try and get across how I felt about getting those individuals what I believe they deserved.
The major point I was trying to get across was that simply we’re brothers in a fraternity. As brothers we look out for one and other. I understand that there are rules and guidelines, but I truly felt that as brothers we look at each other and how we conduct ourselves and the integrity of each individual and how that should have more priority over rules and regulations.
Some of the main arguments that came across were.
1. That if this motion passed it would set “precedence” over other cases similar to this one.
My refutation was that I am presenting this motion, not trying to set any type of precedence on anything, but merely trying to get what I believe the people who did me a favor what they deserved.
2. People do service and don’t get recognition, why should these people be any different
I believe I said its true I agreed with what that person said, but for myself “I” wanted to have them recognized. They did a huge favor for me and I felt they deserved the credit.
One of the Key things I hope everybody got out of this was that each and every individual who was going to receive credit, were individuals with integrity and that every individual I named were all ACTIVE actives and not just people trying to squeeze by with the bare minimum. 3 are pledge trainers and 1 has gone to every meeting and actively goes to events. And that it was a little disheartening to understand that there was no leeway for any compromise, even with these types of individuals.
I guess what i've decided to do here in this note is just to get across my ideas and viewpoints.
*note a lot of things that i am going to talk about here i've said during the discussion part of the motion"
So the motion i created was "i move to credit Kyle Higashidani, Matt Tan, Brian Chen, and Jacky Luong 3 hours of community service hours for their involvement with creating sectionals favors for sectionals."
The first point i wanted to come across with was that I openly admitted that i had not done my job properly and that that is why in my motion i had not put my name up for receiving service hours and that because i didn't do my job properly that the individuals name above shouldn't be discredited.
The next point I wanted to come across was that I wasn’t here to try to sneak around the SVPs and that I wasn’t trying to take advantage of the system. I was merely using my active powers to try and get across how I felt about getting those individuals what I believe they deserved.
The major point I was trying to get across was that simply we’re brothers in a fraternity. As brothers we look out for one and other. I understand that there are rules and guidelines, but I truly felt that as brothers we look at each other and how we conduct ourselves and the integrity of each individual and how that should have more priority over rules and regulations.
Some of the main arguments that came across were.
1. That if this motion passed it would set “precedence” over other cases similar to this one.
My refutation was that I am presenting this motion, not trying to set any type of precedence on anything, but merely trying to get what I believe the people who did me a favor what they deserved.
2. People do service and don’t get recognition, why should these people be any different
I believe I said its true I agreed with what that person said, but for myself “I” wanted to have them recognized. They did a huge favor for me and I felt they deserved the credit.
One of the Key things I hope everybody got out of this was that each and every individual who was going to receive credit, were individuals with integrity and that every individual I named were all ACTIVE actives and not just people trying to squeeze by with the bare minimum. 3 are pledge trainers and 1 has gone to every meeting and actively goes to events. And that it was a little disheartening to understand that there was no leeway for any compromise, even with these types of individuals.
Leave a comment
